Introduction

Decarbonization efforts often focus on large industrial complexes, leaving small and mobile emitters without viable carbon capture solutions. This case study explores the development of a compact, cost-effective, MEA-based carbon capture prototype designed to operate on small exhaust streams. Built through an innovation challenge on “Modeling and Analysis of the Carbon Capture Process,” the prototype successfully demonstrated meaningful CO₂ capture performance in a simple, real-world setup.

The proof-of-concept highlights the potential for affordable and retrofit-friendly carbon capture systems that can support small industrial, commercial, and mobile sources, which are often overlooked by conventional carbon capture technologies. Commercial development of the prototype would require further testing and validation.

Industry context & problem statement

Industries generating CO₂ from small boilers, generators, engines, and distributed assets face a unique challenge. Conventional post-combustion carbon capture systems are engineered for large emitters, demand substantial capital investment, and require continuous high-volume flue gas streams. This leaves a critical gap for small or transient sources where decarbonization is equally important but technologically inaccessible.

Emerging climate strategies require the development of compact, modular, and low-cost CO₂ capture systems. The innovation challenge aimed to address this gap by exploring whether a simple, low-cost, solvent-based prototype could demonstrate meaningful CO₂ reduction.

Solution approach

The team designed and built a bench-scale post-combustion CO₂ capture prototype using the well-established chemistry of MEA-based solvent

Key design features

Key Design Features of CO2

Key facts

  • Prototype based on post-combustion CO₂ absorption using MEA-based solvent
  • Tested with real engine exhaust, not synthetic gas
  • Achieved ~59% capture in a closed setup using 350 mL MEA
  • Delivered ~35% capture in an open 4-minute run under variable flow
  • Enabled remote, real-time CO₂ monitoring through IoT connectivity
  • Identified clear engineering pathways for scale-up and refinement

Results & observations

Performance highlights

CO2 Closed System

CO2 Open System

Operational insights

Lessons learned

  • Material suitability is critical: PVC is effective for rapid prototyping but unsuitable for long-term or high-temperature use.
  • Gas tightness drives efficiency: Leakage pathways can significantly reduce capture performance.
  • Sensor positioning & calibration matter: Minor shifts in sensor location affect CO₂ readings and efficiency calculations.
  • Regeneration is essential for viability: Without a solvent recovery pathway, operational cost and environmental impact increase.
  • Flow control improves reliability: Consistent gas and liquid flow rates are required to stabilize efficiency in open systems.

Business & sustainability impact

Although at the proof-of-concept stage, the prototype demonstrates strategic promise:

This approach offers organizations a future pathway to adopt carbon capture technologies without major capital investment or operational disruption. The model’s commercial feasibility has to be assessed as part of future development work.

Engineering roadmap for scale-up

To progress from a prototype to a pilot-ready solution, several technical advancements are required:

Engineering priorities

Preparing for scale-up

  • Develop a digital twin to simulate absorber performance and guide scale-up.
  • Upgrade absorber construction to industrial-grade materials
  • Design a regeneration subsystem for MEA reuse
  • Implement flow-controlled gas and liquid circulation
  • Conduct extended durability and safety testing
  • Build a pilot-scale, modular absorber for real industrial flue gas
  • Perform TEA and LCA assessments to quantify viability

Acknowledgments

This prototype was developed through collaborative effort by the Quest Global innovation team:

Arjun G (Project Leader), Santosh Chittaragi, (Lead Engineer), Kiran Bhagavati, Libin Antony (Senior Engineers),Venkatesh Sonnad, Amogh Kulkarni (Engineers)

A compact, low-cost approach to carbon capture for small and distributed emitters

A compact, low-cost approach to carbon capture for small and distributed emitters

About the Authors

Arjun G

Arjun G

Project Lead, Quest Global

Talk to the author